Paranormal Studio – Museo Faggiano 3/3 – L’analisi – Real footage [Eng. subs available]

Paranormal Studio – Museo Faggiano 3/3 – L’analisi – Real footage [Eng. subs available]

August 7, 2019 3 By William Hollis


We came back to our burrow
and we’re going to examine all the material we
collected during our investigation. We immediately
notice something strange. You said something? Pause it. Event: audio anomaly
Source: HD camera
Evaluation: negative This is when we got into the first basement. Here is where I had the first strange feeling. I associated it with an environmental
change: from a bright place to a darker one. Let’s say that I felt a bit claustrophobic. It was a peculiar feeling, but… I didn’t feel anything unusual in that place… In my view, the drops make an impressive effect. The drops that come down? These below. –Yes? The camera focuses on them
later, so they seem to come down. Really? – Take a look. Well, I’d just filmed a hole located under the stairs. It seemed an insignificant
thing, but in fact I wanted to film it. I had a feeling that suggested me:
“I have to film this”. Nothing more. The strange thing is that then
the owner told us that other visitors had perceived a peculiar
concentration of energy in that point. So, the fact that you find yourself
inexplicably filming it it’s an interesting coincidence. There was that moment when I was really nervous. I strangely calmed down when we start the first tour. But there was a moment… Did you remember when we were on the balcony? You went on the balcony, then you
looked back with your eyes opened wide. Another one on the beginning of the first tour. Rewind. – Uh? [ This is the fireplace. ] This is the fireplace. This is the fireplace. *strange sound* Event: audio anomaly
Source: HD camera
Evaluation: doubtful Emiliano answers to Davide in the
basement, but there seems to be something else. Is it always his answer? [ 21,8 here ] [ OK… we’re still (undefined)] Event: audio anomaly
Source: HD camera
Evaluation: doubtful In this sequence of the 2 a.m. tour,
something happens in the lower left. Something we didn’t notice on the spot. Event: video anomaly
Source: HD camera
Evaluation: doubtful The video image is followed by this audio,
which can be traced back to the street noise. Event: audio anomaly
Source: HD camera
Evaluation: negative Guys, that sucks. Do you think it could be the stairs? Yes, when they resound it sounds like a moan. [ …the source of our mysterious fragrance. ] One thing… OK, the environmental deodorizer…
But was it programmable? – No. Why haven’t we noticed it before?
When we were with Vito, when we got in for the interview. I don’t remember it. [ After closing the windows
we noticed this fragrance the most. ] With the windows opened…
[ We revealed the mystery… ] Event: perceived fragrance
Source: detected on the spot
Evaluation: negative This is the first anomalous audio
also noticed on the spot. [ You said something? – No. ] [ You said something? ]
– Wait, wait… You said something? You said something? Event: perceived noise
Source: on the spot
Evaluation: doubtful This is strange, because on tape
I ask you if you said something… Yes. – But actually you can hear a sort of sigh. My question on tape makes me
know that I heard something more at that moment. Exactly. It’s strange. And I thought it was you,
instead, evidently it wasn’t you. See, finally, I told you that I heard a “tack”. Now I remember that maybe I heard
something like a sound coming from the computer, from the camera. It was a sort of “tack”. In fact, I said it. This sigh we have just identified
doesn’t seem to be related… As you can see the wireless
camera shows no sign of oddity. You said something? – No. Sorry, but.. Look here. I see a hood here. The image at first sight
may be disturbing, but the alleged hood is nothing but the reflection
of Emiliano T-shirt ‘s sleeve. This is confirmed by the
imperceptible outline of the face above it. The most irrefutable proof
is the reflection of the leaf door, which, depending on the perspective,
masks that one of the alleged hood. This wouldn’t happen if
the object were out of the window. Kind of like the trees that are always visible. Event: video anomaly
Source: HD camera
Evaluation: negative Double occurrence in the yard.
Here’s the first one, not detected on the spot. Can you hear it? – Was it you? I don’t think so, I hope not, even because
I did everything I could to not whisper, unless I do it without realizing it, but… Event: audio anomaly
Source: HD camera
Evaluation: doubtful Well, we heard a strange audio,
I don’t say one of the first ’cause we’ve already heard a couple of strange sounds. But this seems perhaps the clearest one. And… despite having heard it several times… However, this time I’ve been
very careful to not whisper I’m sure I whispered later
and in fact I said it, ’cause I realized it. If I did it here too, it seems
strange to me that I didn’t realize it. The sound is clear. Something seemed
to be said, but we still don’t understand the words. What if I said something
before changing the batteries? I hope I didn’t say something away
from the microphone while you were turned. Maybe I said something about the dead batteries… I don’t know. So, I didn’t whisper, I actually spoke
aloud, but the camera microphone was turned. That’s why I don’t remember
any whispers. I certainly not whisper. But maybe it wasn’t a whisper
and I don’t remember now. Then the noise of the window closed. Consider that there will also be
the other strange thing here soon, if it’s true. We’re going to see it now. – Exactly. On the tape, the alleged noise
of the slamming door seems much further than the perceived one. – Yes, exactly. This makes me suppose
that it was the sound of a nearby window. At the moment maybe we were
distracted and it seemed to us much closer. Event: noise perceived
Source: heard on the spot
Evaluation: negative It’s the moment of the sound that
during the last tour froze the two guys. Was it you? – No. Well, this audio startled us
when we got there. – Yes. I thought it was a sound coming
from the computer right then and there, from the audio recorded by the camera. But listening to it again, I realize it’s not
the sound I thought I had heard on the spot. At that moment the wireless camera
filmed a probable insect flying past the lens and then it stopped for a few seconds. This explains the distorted audio
that was emitted when it unblocked. Event: noise perceived
Source: heard on the spot
Evaluation: negative This is when I heard the noise. A possible explanation
has already been given about the noise that awakened
Emiliano during the night. Here, someone is throwing buckets of water. It could also be the sound of a bucket
of water thrown on the ground, even if… Event: noise perceived
Source: heard on the spot
Evaluation: negative This is the last audio anomaly. You said something? – I’ve heard it too. “Who are you?” Event: audio anomaly
Source: HD camera
Evaluation: doubtful During the ten hours of footage
of the wireless camera we found no paranormal clue. The only anomalies were white pixels,
interruption of few seconds and sudden blurring, which are all attributable
to normal technical origins. The only thing that made us
perplexed is the following. Looking at the crack in the
right corner of the room you can see two little
bright dots at some point, which are very different from
the commonly previously noted pixels. For example, here in the lower left corner. Analysing the image we’ve come
to the conclusion that it is an artefact for the following reasons: the lights are
present only in a single image caught on camera, the anomaly doesn’t persist
to the change with the next one; the colour of the lights is too pure
compared to the tonality of all the rest; the alleged lights did not
reflect on the glass below; the two flares do not change
the brightness of the surrounding stones. If they were two eyes they would be too low, and if they belonged to a child,
as they told us during the visit, the head would be disproportionately large. In favour of the doubt we have only one element: among the first things Marco
told us, his girlfriend got scared by two lights in the corner of the chapel. With disparity of evidence, and
finding the first ones more convincing, we file the event as negative. Event: video anomaly
Source: wireless camera
Evaluation: negative We finished examining all the material
we collected during our investigation. I have something to say. Despite even this time we haven’t
found what we were looking for, the experience to the Faggiano Museum
was the one that confuse me the most. I don’t know if you agree. Because we collected numerous ambiguous things, which slightly startled us even on the spot. The noise of the window that closed itself in the video seems to come from further away. The noise of sheets that
woke me up at 4:30 in the morning, as mentioned in the footage, it could presumably be a bucket of water thrown on the street. Let’s say that they are two similar sounds. The noise we heard climbing
the stairs during the 3:30 tour. We attributed it to a sound
of the wireless camera. Even though the noise we heard
in the spot was different from what we then heard again on the camera. The voice while I was changing the
batteries, which maybe it’s mine, maybe not. However we were looking for
a clear image of a monk or a Templar Knight. I mean, those who saw it, as usual,
said they saw it clear and without a doubt. All that we have collected are
strange sounds even in this case. As long as they remain such as those,
I tend to catalogue them as pure suggestion, pure imagination or bad interpretation. They also told us they saw photos… However, many similar events happened
to different people who did not know. The owner didn’t even tell them anything
during the visit to the museum. The fact is that more than one person,
for example, says he/she saw a knight or a monk with moustache, and nobody
told these people about that presence with moustache. There are some elements
in common that are peculiar coincidences. Yes, this investigation
turned me a little upside down. There, I’ve felt a little more sense
of oppression, let’s say so, but I think it’s all due by the much
more claustrophobic environment. There were so many doors, so many
hidden corners and dark corners. – Yes. Of course, there was an
outside background noise, which lasted until 3:30 in the morning. But we noticed that this noise
was audible practically only in the two rooms that faced the street. – Exactly. In the others rooms it wasn’t too audible. They were also well distinguishable noises. Those few noises that startled us,
however, seemed something different. You said something right.
I felt like I was confused. When you heard something that was a bit out of
the ordinary, it gave you a sense of bewilderment. The comment you made on Leap Castle is right. All that turned out to be strange,
it turned out during the analysis. But here, as I said, there were many
things we did not understand on the spot. And so this made us grope a little in the dark. What they told us is something
very concrete, not ambiguous. In my opinion even too much. –Yes. I mean they seem to be
talking about things they clearly see. So, nitpicking over the audio
recorded and over a pixel of a photo it’s something that
go beyond what we are looking for. When we asked Luciano
if we could see something that night he smiled as if… and he nodded his head, as if he knew that nothing
would have appeared to us. Luciano’s point of view is slightly
different from that of Séan, for example. At Leap Castle, the idea of
Séan was this: an event that if there were more people,
everybody would have seen it. According to Luciano
it was a very subjective thing. The phenomena remains
restricted to that single person. In my opinion it’s
much more realistic because who really sees something
have to be predisposed, in my opinion. If there is something to be seen,
at a given moment, I think everybody sees it. I agree with what
you said about perceptions. But I think that when we
are talking about a vision or a sound, I think that if there are two people
in the room, they would both perceive it. I’m more inclined to this idea. Since apparently photos with
something strange in them were taken, we promised ourselves that if
they can get one from one of the visitors they will send it to us. It would be very interesting. It’s a world that is still unknown.
We still don’t know if these entities think, if they know what they’re doing
(from what people say, seems like they do), if they decide to show themselves
or if it’s a totally accidental thing regulated by something else. I don’t remember if Marco or
Luciano told us that, in his view, the presence would have not been
shown to us because we were there to film it. I will quote once again Séan’s words: “They want let us know they are here, that they exist.” So, I don’t see why hiding at a camera. Are we sure they want
let us know that they exist? They would not even manifest
themselves in those few moments when they would come to touch you. We have so many “maybe”,
those which we don’t like. And we catalogue them as non-clues. We hope to find some
answers in the next investigation. Faggiano Museum
11 July 2014 Location:
Lecce – Italy Participations:
Emiliano Girardi
Vittorio Ambrosetti
Davide Pagani Thank you to
Luciano and Marco Faggiano Musics:
Undo – Grace Valhalla
Melancholy – Grace Valhalla
Triptrack 5 – Ioeo Paranormal Studio is
a Hunters 12 Pictures production.